Home

Resourcing

Consulting

Networking

Training

About NLM

Where to Find What

Products

Contact Us

Subscribe

AEC1998

Record of the Proceedings

First Anabaptist Evangelism Council
Elgin, Illinois – February 21-22, 1998

Theme: Anabaptist Witness in a Postmodern Society

recorded by Ronald W. Waters

 

Saturday, February 21

Welcome and Announcements—S. Joan Hershey, Coordinator, New Life Ministries

Worship (Summary)—Linford Stutzman, Director of the John Coffman Center and Assistant Professor of Culture and Mission, Eastern Mennonite University

We live in a culture with many worldview. Pluralism is a good context for an authentic representation of the gospel. Where the religious control of a monoculture is possible, authentic representation of the gospel suffers and eventually dies. Control, co-existence, and competition are three basic options facing Anabaptists within pluralism. Competition is the only option that is authentically Christian and authentically Anabaptist.

The Shema—Deuteronomy 6:4-8—represents a "portable" worldview: a method of shaping a worldview over generations among the people of God wherever they went. It is the concept of a pilgrim people, a worldview meant for invasion, competition, and victory, but not for preservation or to be static.

As Anabaptist Christians, we do not live in Christendom but, as with the Jewish people, we live in "Babylon." Babylonian society did not reinforce what the parents taught their children about reality—it competed with it. This is the situation we face within pluralism. "Babylon" has invaded our homes and our hearts.

Competition is threatening. Two options can be attempted. Control is an option for some: to create isolated communities where worldview may be managed. Co-existence is another option: to adapt, synthesize, modify, reinterpret in order to accommodate. Neither is faithful nor effective if Jesus is the standard of measurement. We must, like Jesus, learn to compete.

Secular "shemas" are opposite and compete with the kingdom worldview: "Hear, oh people, there are multiple images of reality, many truths, equally valid worldviews. You can love and serve any one of these, for all reality, values, and authority are relative, optional, specific, and personal. No truth is absolute or universal."

Contemporary culture, the media, and the entertainment industry are build on two strong American (Western) ideals: free expression and free enterprise. Free expression uplifts freedom of speech and expressive individualism. Free enterprise is driven by technology: 98% of US households own a color TV, 80% own a video cassette recorder (used 7.32 hours per day), 65% have cable TV (average of 102 channels), and 35% own computers. Such technology impacts our worldview.

We must become worldview missionaries, competing in order to win. In the Old Testament, God commanded a deliberate shaping of the worldview of children. Likewise, the local congregation must be motivated and equipped to respond in new and powerful ways to counteract the worldviews of modern culture.

We can compete successfully at the level of authenticity—we must be like Jesus. Youth are hungry for authenticity and righteousness. My congregation (Immanuel) invites persons to join a congregation "where it is difficult to be a member and easy to be a Christian—not the other way around." College students are flocking to it.

These are the characteristics of congregations that will be faithful and relevant in the future:

— Authentic: the Jesus preached is the Jesus practiced

— Integrity: honesty within and without; Christians are not Jesus, but we know and confess the truth, the life, the way of Jesus unapologetically

— Vibrant: experiential, emotional, exuberant, confident; in a word, passionate

— Relevant: know the meaning of the language, symbols, and rituals of pluralism, but also know the meaning of Anabaptist/Christian language, symbols, and rituals and how this is making a difference in the local community

— Demanding and demonstrating sacrificial life: where people are called to give rather than receive, and this is demonstrated by adults

I would like to advocate a new type of congregationalism—one where congregations compete with each other seeking to win youth to the most authentic expression of discipleship.

Here are three features of a competitive congregation within postmodernity:

1. Confidently confessional—faithful to the message of Jesus as Lord, way, truth, life; honest in agreeing that truth of Jesus and the reality of the kingdom of God; consistent; relevant so that the reality of the kingdom of God is related to life as experienced.

2. Entrepreneurial congregation—creative, innovative, risk-taking.

3. Powerful congregation—unapologetic in what it claims about Jesus; persuasive in its message and life; attractive to the point of being invitational; and loving, full of grace and truth.

Consider this Anabaptist "shema" in the "Babylon" of postmodernity:

Here, oh Anabaptists. The God revealed in Jesus is Lord alone in all cultures, including pluralism. You shall love the Lord your God as Jesus demonstrated: with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your might. Do not forget that the words Jesus commanded you are for his followers in all times and places. Talk the talk and walk the walk before your children and your neighbor's children; when you are at home and when you work and travel, when you are in the privacy of your home and with others in the church and the world. Let your hands and your hearts be consistent with what you say about your faith. Love the people of your community and the world as you love your own heritage and your own people.

Get Acquainted—Ronald W. Waters, Assistant Professor of Evangelism, Ashland Theological Seminary, and Consultant for Evangelism/Church Growth, The Brethren Church.

[break]

Introduction of New Life Ministries—S. Joan Hershey, Coordinator, New Life Ministries

After sharing an "Essay on Life" (illustrated with a box of Life cereal), Hershey shared the mission statement of New Life Ministries: to multiply the number of persons turning to Jesus Christ by multiplying the number of leaders and congregations that are spiritually alive and evangelistically effective. This mission statement is lived out in four ways:

1. Promote uniqueness of Anabaptist/believers' church tradition

2. Produce quality materials to empower

3. Provide consultations, networking, and training events

4. Propagate alliances

New Life Ministries was formed at the beginning of 1998 as the successor to The Andrew Center. New Life Ministries is administered through a staff that oversees day to day operations; a management team that assists in setting the operational direction; a board of directors that establishes policy broadly; and the Anabaptist Evangelism Council that offers opportunity for evangelism, church vitality, and church planting agencies to gather for networking and working together on common ministries.

Current (supporting) partners in New Life Ministries are the Mennonite Church, General Conference Mennonite Church, Church of the Brethren, The Brethren Church, and Shalom Foundation. Funding comes from partner contributions, sales, seminars, and contributions. Currently, New Life Ministries is redesigning the LIFE (Living in Faithful Evangelism) process for congregations who may or may not have participated in LIFE/Passing On the Promise. Future plans call for establishment of communication vehicles, training seminars, and the possibility of a satellite office in Canada.

Focus for the Anabaptist Evangelism Council—Marilyn Miller, Director of Outreach Ministries, Commission on Home Ministries, General Conference Mennonite Church

Referring to the Church of the Brethren motto ("continuing the work of Jesus peacefully, simply, together"), Miller noted that every denomination has some light and salt to share with all other churches. The unique contribution of Anabaptist denominations may be that there is another way of living. The question we must ask ourselves: Are we sharing our community with others?

The composition of this council recognized that we need both scholars and practitioners to share resources and listen to one another on this issue: What does God want us to do together in evangelism and outreach?

The purpose of this meeting is to envision a model for Anabaptist witness which will enable our congregations to more consistently reflect the transforming gospel of Jesus Christ in our postmodern society. It will also provide us an opportunity to share how each of us is doing evangelism in the contemporary context.

Teaching/Reflection on Mark 1:14-15—"Christian Evangelism: Revealing the Heart of the Gospel"—Robert J. "Jack" Suderman, Executive Secretary, Resources Commission, Conference of Mennonites in Canada

Suderman began by recalling a comment by George Brunk III at a May 1997 consultation that gave rise to this council: For 70 years Anabaptists have worked together around the world in social ministry under an umbrella organization. But when it comes to church planting, congregational renewal, and evangelism in the "home" sense of the world, we have found it a lot more difficult to work together. It's about time we do.

Can we assume that as North American Anabaptists that we agree on the gospel that we wish to communicate to our culture? Some might agree that we do; others might agree that we do but might also disagree as to what the answer might be. It is clear that we do not agree on everything. But we need to have a common understanding about out task: 1) that we understand the forces at work in our cultures well enough to speak God's truth with relevance to it; and 2) that we understand the Christian gospel well enough so as to not preach an acculturated version of nationalism, capitalism, or other "isms" prevalent in our societies.

Suderman then led participants in an individual exercise to identify three key words that should be included in a basic understanding of what the gospel is for our society. He followed this with a group exercise of sharing the three words and developing a definition of the Christian gospel from the words shared. Frequently mentioned words included: Jesus/Christ, Scripture, atonement, confession, body, discipleship, formation, transformation, incarnation, peace, life, conversion, eternal, Bible, lifestyle, Trinity, cross, faith. Some of the statements shared included:

— Jesus the indwelling word of love and grace offers forgiveness for sin and discipleship

— The repentance cross and faith . . . leads to the life and resurrection of the church in the kingdom of God

— Jesus the word proclaims peace, love, and reconciliation

— Eternal salvation

— As revealed in scripture, Jesus one of the Trinity

— God has brought us salvation in Jesus Christ . . . to be lived in community . . . a sign of the reign of God

Suderman followed these activities with a look Mark 1:14-15 as a possible definition of the gospel, including two emphases: proclaiming the gospel of God and believing in the gospel. Jesus came preaching the message, the good message, the positive message. What is the content of this message? Time has been fulfilled; the kingdom of God is at hand. This message invites reaction, and it has a sense of urgency. God's rule and the reign of God has come into our midst and is present where we are. That is a good message. It encourages response, it asks for repentance, it asks for belief.

I wish to suggest that the coming of the kingdom of God was Jesus' working definition of the heart of the gospel of God. The announcement that God's rule/God's power is in our midst, that the world is within the hands and the control of God, this is good news. It is good for those who would like to see people be transformed to be more like God. It is the message of possibility. It is a message of possibility. It is a message of probability. It is a message of reality. It is a message of realism.

It is good news for those who are interested in seeing the world change to reflect more the character of its maker. For those who look forward to change and transformation, this is good news. it is news of possibility and of necessity.

Believing this message will align efforts in different directions. It is good news for the poor, the suffering, the marginalized, the victims. It means that new power for transformation is available for all.

I wish to propose that if this working definition of the gospel was good enough for Jesus, it should be good enough for us. What might it mean for evangelism in North America today?

I wish to propose that the entire Gospel of Mark can, in a sense, be read as an expansion of Mark 1:14-15. It details the possibilities, the conflicts, the reactions, the characteristics, and the dimensions of what it means that God's rule has become present in the person of Jesus Christ in Palestine. The gospel of Jesus Christ demonstrates to us what it means to live intentionally within and responding to the presence of God's rule in Palestine and on earth.

Suderman then assigned different chapters from the Gospel of Mark to groups to determine how the text amplifies and clarifies Mark 1:14-15. The groups then shared their findings. Suderman then summarized this biblical study as follows:

God's time has been fulfilled. God's reign is here. This news calls for response. Repent. Turn around. Life your life in accordance with the reality of God's reign in your midst. Believe that it's true that God's power and rule are present. Live accordingly. How does one change one's life now that we know about the presence of this reign? Gather a community dedicated to living according to this news (Mark 1:16-19). Confront other spirits that occupy people's lives (1:21-2:23). Discover how this principle means that Christ's Lordship is over all (2:18-3:35). Understand how this Lordship and this kingdom are present and grow (4:1-41). Respond to the power of this presence in the world (5:1-43). Proclaim the presence. Confront the idols. Provide the alternatives. Overcome the fears. Be committed even through suffering, pain, threat, and death. Be assured that the power of the resurrection is greater than the power of death. Live your lives with this knowledge.

 

[dinner]

Mission Focus of Groups Attending—Ed Bontrager, Mennonite Board of Congregational Ministries, The Mennonite Church

Each of the organizations represented shared a summary of their current activities. Many shared handouts describing their ministries. Reports were presented by the following organizations:

Canadian Mennonite Bible College—Titus F. Guenther

Conference of Mennonites in Canada—Tym Elias

General Conference Mennonite Church, Commission on Home Ministries—Gilberto Flores

Ashland Theological Seminary—Fred Finks

The Brethren Church—Emanuel "Buzz: Sandberg

Mennonite Board of Missions—James Kraybill

Christian Community—Joan Hershey on behalf of Steve Clapp

Associated Mennonite Biblical Seminary, Mission Training Center—Walter Sawatsky.

Brethren Revival Fellowship—James Myer

Eastern Mennonite University and Seminary, John Coffman Center—Linford Stutzman

Church of the Brethren General Board—Stafford Frederick

Bethany Theological Seminary and Brethren Academy for Ministerial Leadership— Harriet Finney

Eastern Mennonite Missions—Dave Witmer

General Conference Mennonite Church, Commission on EducationKen Hawkley

Shalom Foundation—Dick Benner

Mennonite Board of Congregational Ministries—Ed Bontrager

New Life Ministries—Joan Hershey

[adjournment for the day]

Sunday, February 22

WorshipWorship Leader: David West, Director of Congregational Ministries, The Brethren Church; Speaker: Fred Finks, President, Ashland Theological Seminary

Finks spoke on the theme, "Renew My Spirit," based on Psalm 51:1-12. Based on a dictionary definition of "renew," he identified and spoke on these topics: revive, restore, regenerate, rebuild, repeat, resume, and repent. He concluded by asking, "What is God pointing his finger at in your life?"

Teaching Event—Moderator: Bob Kettering, Member of the Board, New Life Ministries

The teaching event included presentations from five persons representing each of the partner denominations of New Life Ministries. Each presentation focused on the theme of understanding postmodern North American culture and ways for our denominations to discover our unique evangelization roles as Anabaptists.

Manuscripts or summaries of the presentations appear in the booklet, Anabaptist Witness in a Postmodern Society: Presentations to the First Annual Meeting of the Anabaptist Evangelism Council.

Presenters were:

Anabaptist Evangelism in the Context of Modernity and Postmodernity – Lois Barrett, Executive Secretary, Commission on Home Ministries, General Conference Mennonite Church

Anabaptist Evangelism in a Postmodern World – Dale Stoffer, Associate Professor of Historical Theology, Ashland Theological Seminary

Anabaptist Witness in a Postmodern Society: A Canadian Case Study – Titus Guenther, Assistant Professor, Canadian Mennonite Bible College

Understanding Postmodern North American Culture and Ways for Our Denominations to Discover Our Unique Evangelization Role as Anabaptists – Paul Mundey, Senior Pastor, Frederick, Md., Church of the Brethren

Concluding Comments – Linford Stutzman, Director of the John Coffman Center and Assistant Professor of Culture and Mission, Eastern Mennonite University

[lunch]

Teaching Event: Responses and Discussion—Moderator: Bob Kettering, with the presenters as a panel

A lively time of discussion ensued among the council participants and the panel of presenters.

Visioning Session for Future Cooperation—Moderators: S. Joan Hershey and Marilyn Miller

The stated purpose of this session was: "What are the ways in which we can strategize together and resource one another for a more effective Anabaptist witness in evangelism?"

An example was given: as Hitler was entering Poland, the Polish cavalry with horses and rifles found themselves facing Hitler's Panzer divisions— a complete paradigm shift in military warfare. We must equip our churches or otherwise we will find ourselves facing a similar situation with our world.

The moderators shared a list of potential modules under consideration for development by New Life Ministries. Participants were asked to indicate any additional topics that should be considered and indicate any of the topics on which they/their organizations have worked or are working. They were also asked to prioritize the four most important issues to address first.

Question: What more can we do together?

• Respect our different organizations: provide one-page bullet type reports. For future council meetings, consider sharing in advance position statements (1-2 pages), followed by focus groups around particular/key questions, then shared corporately; then reconfigure focus groups to have another round at it.

• Evangelism/church planting: seems many of us see church planting as a tool of evangelism. Rebuild through evangelism and church planting.

• Work together in church planter assessments, common coaching; encouraging churches to plant churches

• Mennonite Board of Missions urban directors have moved to different locations, on-site to where someone is doing ministry/training. Place of our meeting may be equally important.

• Hold meetings at a church plant; have local people come teach us.

• Praxis

• Learn from mistakes; summit may be valuable to bring together like-minded groups to dialog

• English speakers always start a church among Hispanics. How do we define what is Hispanic? When one begins a church, often do so because of an enthusiastic group that will do so. Agencies often think, "This is a cultural thing, let them do it." Therefore Hispanic churches in US have least sense of identity in this country, not only in theological but also missiological and ecclesiological terms; not incorporated into bigger ecclesial project, an appendage, dangerous. This leads to accusations that Hispanics are not formal. Suggest a project where we would create materials to help agencies understand the Hispanic reality. The General Conference Mennonite Commission on Home Ministries has some materials that may be helpful, in English, done by a specialist who is both a theologian and a pastor, and it may help the agencies understand the profile of Hispanic churches in the United States

• Fastest growing group in Eastern Mennonite Missions is the Spanish group (Samuel Lopez— Hispanic training center)

• Several churches in Church of the Brethren South/Central Indiana District are talking about becoming sister churches for renewal and church planting; networking congregations with similar interests—partner church networking

Question: Is a gather such as this council worthwhile?

• Difficulty of finding readily available models; can turn to other movements more aligned with dominant model, more readily available. Find some compatible synergy within the Anabaptist movement. Without getting together, we don't have people power and money individually [to find or create these models]. Need to find ways to cooperate to build that energy.

• In Brethren Church we have been overly influenced by evangelicalism. Would like to see us develop connectedness with other groups who share our convictions. Forum like this and connectedness is very important. Too small to have all these resources ourselves.

• Iron sharpens iron.

• Bringing together academics and practitioners is important. Comments from academic institutions?

Question to those from academic communities: Is this helpful to you, and would you want to be a part of something like this in the future?

• Very valuable to me, will share with colleagues. With students, reach them through small nudges; easier to guide students when aware of what agencies are doing

• Also find it helpful, especially with regard to Brethren/Bethany Academy. More we can share about transforming church leadership, we will find more ways to influence congregations and church planting.

• Voice of other parts of the church is so loud, our voice will be lost if we do not gather to keep it alive; amplify this voice. The "competition" is so well organized and pervasive.

• Hope to get more Church of the Brethren people involved in conference on pluralism; easier if it is under the umbrella of a council such as this

• Need to come together to reinforce each other in light of all the other things out there. Understanding the Anabaptist tradition is more experienced that articulated.

• Reinforced what another said about coming into this tradition by choice; stronger because of coming in from outside. Also, call from a pastor who just learned about The Andrew Center/New Life Ministries. Works in mediation; recognizes many congregations not healthy enough to enter into LIFE process.

• Work at partnering churches to work at renewal/bringing churches back to health.

• We have to be careful about developing techniques for church growth; if healthy, evangelism would take care of itself; dynamic, passion.

• This meeting reinforced that institutions and agencies do not operate by same vision. If we have a common vision, it would help us all move forward together. Congregational leadership is shaping our institutions.

Question: Would you see New Life Ministries as primarily a resource to your congregations or a resource to your agencies and institutions that work with congregations?

• In Church of the Brethren, better to connect with congregations directly, based on what I am hearing.

• How will agencies feel if group bypasses agencies?

• Need is so great, bless anyone who can help congregations.

• Issue of control is a critical issue. In Church of the Brethren, we have deployed Congregational Life Teams and are still vulnerable.

• Noted that New Life Ministries is trying to work with Congregational Life Teams by bridging to them. Want to build the trust level and pass along people to the specific denominational representatives.

• Does not see Canadian Mennonite Bible College as being in this loop.

• Each denomination may have different expectations. New Life Ministries is set up so denominational people with responsibility sit on the management team and exercise some control over the "valve" about involvement with congregations. The Andrew Center experience has proved effective.

• Must see that evangelism is not either/or but is a part of all that we do, not separate from other activities

• Denominations need to continually communicate with congregations and other denominations so that territorial issues will not be so strong

• One New Life Ministries congregational advisor reported on efforts to send copy of communications with congregations to appropriate conference mission staff person to let them know that communication is taking place

• We in denominational agencies have thought of ourselves as the "general store" where every church "shops." Reality is that we are not the only provider; ever-expanding resource providers. Many other groups, however, have Anabaptist values (even if not in the Anabaptist circle). Churches will go wherever they can get done what needs to be done.

• A lot of the basic need is rather generic for jump starting congregations.

• We must be aware of a postdenominational mentality.

• How to have a mission concern at the heart of Mennonite integration. Assembly element of LIFE program brought people together. Is content to be shaped by stage in LIFE process? Or accumulation of churches for vision building? Is this possible?

• Yes, but challenge of finding what is the proper vehicle.

• Going to an academy for that length of time was costly, time-consuming. Possibly have a regional planning team (Canadian plan) to plan/conduct one-day event/shorter term, regional. Rather than top-down, consultant to regional planning team.

• While people are working piecemeal, there is the same vacuum of a long term relationship. Congregations looking for longer term relationship. When process ended, long-term relationship missing was missing.

• Longing for community is great. People found it in Evangelism Leaders Academies. In congregations, the glue that holds us together also keeps people out.

Question (based on hearing affirmation for getting together again): Theme? Where? When? Who else?

• Affirm move out of this type of setting to more of an active ministry setting/"case study"

• At Mennonite Board of Missions, just finished evaluation of outreach training materials. Mission communicators ask questions about what is agenda of the world. We heard internally about issues of worship and spirituality as a high priority/themes and trends in the church. Help equip congregations to think about missions within the context of spirituality and worship. How do we connect with things going on in some congregation? What is energizing churches? What resources should we build?

• Richness of variety of denominations. Need to become more multi-ethnic and gender diversity. Networking is a real value. One of the most valued results will be the listing of names.

• International Conference Center in Chicago is close to ministries we might want to be in touch with.

• Perhaps alternate between Chicago and Baltimore/Washington area.

• Newport News area also suggested

• Valuable of in and out over two days. Concern about amount of time to view other ministries.

• On-site could provide worship experience and eat with people and not extend length.

• Perhaps have group split up and share reflections.

• Do we need to draw from other schools of thought? Are we prepared to challenge our market economy? Mass media? What do we mean by democracy, globalization? How does that differ from the tower of Babel? Must not let what we believe become isolated from the reality of the world around us—something outside of that to which we respond.

Question: This year's presentations were all four our tradition. Would it be helpful to draw on leadership from within other traditions?

• A lot of opportunities to get input from other places, but not as many opportunities to get perspective we've had here. Lean toward our own group.

• Agrees, especially during this formative time.

Next Council Meeting:

Time—February 20-21, 1999.

Place—to be established by New Life Ministries Management Team

Who else to invite? Grace Brethren

Worship and SendingJim Myer, Brethren Revival Fellowship

Myer began by telling the story of Brethren in Christ Bishop Henry Ginter. At a combined community worship service held during a snowstorm, he opened the meeting by saying, "Welcome to the Mennonite Brethren in Christ Church of the Brethren Fellowship." In many ways, that is what we have experienced here.

He based his study on Hebrews 6:7-8. The thistle and thorn seed God scattered after the Garden of Eden has gotten around. On agronomy reports, there is never a place to record what the briar patch did. When neglected, thistles, briars, and thorns grow.

The ground is often used to describe our lives and influences that come upon our lives. He told about a waiter who had his thumb on piece of fish to keep it from sliding off the plate . . . again. How quickly things can go wrong. We've had another opportunity to be cultivated, to be rained on. Soon we go to await the harvest. Here are three lessons from agriculture to take with us:

1. Don't stop after you plant the seed

2. There are enemies to deal with—be alert to the enemies of the Christian life

3. Remember the importance of nurturing the plant

The Bible challenges us to water our lives in order to be fruitful (John 15).

Adjournment—The council close by singing a hymn as a personal prayer—"Savior of My Soul."

 

 2000-2008 New Life Ministries (www.NewLifeMinistries-NLM.org). All Rights Reserved.
(see information on our copyright policy)

Top of Page